Showing posts with label women fans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women fans. Show all posts

Monday, July 1, 2013

The Locker Room Debate


Well, well, well. Here we have it people, the ethical debate of the century. Or of the last 35 yearsanyway. Prima Donna Cherry decided to take two whole minutes to educate the masses and cause a few migraines for poor Ron McLean. So therefore the inter-webs screeched “sexism”! But I believe the world should calm down, put on some thinking caps, and think long and hard about Mr. Cherry’s warning for us. 

It’s obvious to anyone who knows the protocol for a woman in the locker room why there are multiple parties unhappy with multiple aspects of locker room behavior. Basically, for those of you who don’t know, it goes something like this:
1) Professional woman enters locker room full of rowdy, sweaty, fresh out the game naked men.
2) Said woman starts asking questions that could be asked/answered literally anywhere else in the world.
3) Sweaty, naked man can then either: a) answer questions awkwardly because he’s naked. b) answer questions in a cocky fashion because he won and is naked. c) Say something snarky because he’s naked (See Scott Hartnell). d) Be sad because he lost, and naked or e) be filmed and naked. In any of these situations the man will be sexist.
4) Unless the woman does something stupid, everyone takes her side because progressive feminism.
Now, there are many different ways one can approach the prospect of having women in the locker room. I’ve taken the initiative to illustrate those opinions for you:
1) The Chauvinistic Geezer
“It makes me uncomfortable!” said Cherry, upon explaining the first time he had a run in with a female reporter in the locker room. While the woman was completely un-rustled, Canada’s sweetheart didn’t feel the same way. (Which is completely acceptable, by the way).
These people are set in their ways of the “olden days” whatever time period that appears to be. Women should not be in the locker room because women shouldn’t do anything (cough, cough) but men should have free reign of anything because they’re professional. Usually well argued, like Cherry’s case, it appears bigoted and sexist to the newer generations. Honestly they’re just a product of their generation.
2) The Progressive Feminazi
Boom.
So, yeah. Women are the superior sex, men are chauvinistic pigs, they think everything, oppression Olympics– blah blah blah. You’ve heard it all. Anything that’s not equality among genders is feminazi madness, or, whatever.
Regardless, they believe in the empowerment of women in all forms. Women should not only allowed to be in the locker rooms, they should be allowed to be naked too! Any male who makes a snarky comment or anything that is not rigidly professional and ignorant of nudity shall be fired, hung up by his manhood and quartered!
3) The Jockey Fan
Can be male or female, but generally male. Quite similar to the chauvinistic geezer, but in a different light. They think it’s sexy that a woman is asking about the power play among naked men with her hair and make-up all did. 
*This goes hand in hand with the locker room fantasy.
4) The Nihilist
Me. No one should see others naked in a locker room. Ask the questions somewhere else. No gender in question, no ethics in question. It’s uncomfortable and unnecessary.
Yep, seeing people naked is unnecessary. Who would have thought, right?

Friday, June 8, 2012

Champaigned Distressed Foil: Why the NHL shop just needs to stop

Beautiful. Simply; utterly beautiful. Gorgeous…Now I can celebrate my love of stick and puck as I dance around looking like Edward Cullens. As if being women hockey fans wasn’t bad enough, they had to go and make it obvious.
After the 35.00$ NHL bikini’s and the 325$ bedazzled purses, and the obsessive use of pink, they now are subjected to whatever you call these.

Supposedly the Shop tries. And possibly they really do, but before they try and create the ‘Champaigned distressed foil’ (which sounds more like a cheap wine that you buy your soon to be ex-wife for your last anniversary than a fabric) they need to focus on their ACTUAL jerseys.

As I’m sure some fans can (and will) tell you, their woman’s 50-75 something dollar Henrik Zetterberg “Authentic Reebok Jersey” were so horribly under par, they nearly broke down.

Here’s how the Shop justifies this horrid erroneous representation of the femme fatal hockey fan:
"Glamorize your NHL wardrobe with some subtle sparkles! Tiny metal studs line the collar of the Reebok women’s champagne jersey, making it a wardrobe essential in your closet. It displays your team’s graphics in distressed champagne foil over team-colored ink on the chest and back. Show off your feminine figure with a flirty side drawstring cinch."
Marvelous.

In all honesty though, it’s the worst so far that they’ve managed to think up attempting to pull other women into the sport, but not near what we know they’ll think up in the future.

What the NHL (and NBA, NFL, MLB) need to figure out (especially the NHL) is that sparkly, bedazzled flashy things are NOT going to draw them to the sport, to be life long fans. Women don’t work that way. Sorry.

The NHL is a special thing, it’s a special, unique sport that (on and off the rink) works differently than any other. Fans aren’t usually drawn in, they’re born. They don’t just up and decide one day that, “Hey! I kinda like this! I’ll watch it all the time, and make enemies at school or work to back myself and my team up and buy all the merchandise I can get my hands on!!”

Looks like the First-Woman-NHL-anything is gonna have to wait a little longer.