Turning Point: For Better or For Worse?

Yesterday, the 12th day of the lockout, the NHL cancelled its entire preseason in a move that has left a great many Canadian-Americans very sad. (See left)

The players are still signing European contracts, the most recently being Tavares signing with a Swiss team and previous Norris Trophy winner Erik Karlsson signing to the Finnish League.

Basically, everything is falling apart. But, today the League subsequently announced that their labor talks will resume in New York giving everyone false hope.

Now, I don't like to be cynical. I'd love to see this article and believe that these will be the talks to end the lockout, but it's just not true. First of all, these talks aren't even about the main issue. Instead, they are debating on how to split the $3 billion annual revenue, according to ESPN. Secondly, many big names have given up hope and joined the sister European leagues, thus causing many fans to give up hope. I mean, I don't know about the rest of you, but I've already got my KHL streams and my SM Liiga subscription.

While it is true that the regular season has not been touched, and is still scheduled for October 11, the league's subsequent actions are sending a very clear message: there will be no NHL hockey this year.

But, at least official harmony was restored to the NFL.

NFL Referees: Hitler Puns Anyone?

So by now, word has spread violently about the call that lost Green Bay their game Monday against the Seattle Seahawks. (Although whether that call alone lost them the game remains to be debated).

And if by some chance you haven't, well, here:

Basically in laymen's terms, Russell Wilson heaved a 24-yard pass into a scrum in the end zone with Seattle trailing 12-7. Tate shoved away a defender illegally using both hands, and the NFL acknowledged Tuesday he should have been penalized, which would have clinched a Packers victory. But as we all know, that cannot be reviewed by instant replay.
Tate and Green Bay safety M.D. Jennings then both got their hands on the ball, though the Packers insisted Jennings had clear possession for a game-ending interception.
Instead, the officials ruled on the field that the players had simultaneous possession, which counts as a reception. Once that happened, the NFL said, the referee was correct that no indisputable visual evidence existed on review to overturn the touchdown call.

So, in other words, the referees lost Green Bay the game. Then, today the league issued a statement backing the referees in their decision.

Now, it hasn't been the greatest NFL season off the field. Goodell lost the lawsuit against the Saints, the referees are still on strike, and Peyton Manning is a Bronco. But I don't think anyone believed the referee drama would go this far. Regardless of how Green Bay should've wrapped up the game in the first quarter, the call was still bunk, and the league backing it just showed their weaknesses after losing the lawsuit earlier in the month.

I don't think anyone has to argue that the call was sound. I don't even think the league really believes it was sound, but if they denied the replacement refs that were put in to replace the referees the league is feuding with, they would look even weaker. The players already have one foot over the power of the league and the last thing they wanted (or needed) was for the referees to have it as well. The unfortunate side to this is that the call was made, and is backed by the league, so there's not much Aaron Rogers can do to defend himself. The only thing left for NFL fans to do is hope and pray that the reign of these referees is soon over.

Then we can all go back to hating them. 

I Want You Back: NSYNC Narrates the NHL Lockout

As I'm sure anyone with a pulse has realized, the NHL is going to be locked out. Nothing you, or I, or that crazy Vancouver Canucks fan does can stop the savage take over of the season. I feel your pain, I really do. Every few days they throw us a bone on ESPN: Players file for Injunction, Everyone loses hope. We're talking, but haha, screw your hopes and dreams. This is going to be a decennial thing now! As if this is something we as hockey fans are supposed to be excited about.

Regardless, the nitty gritty of the Lockout goes something like this:

Bettman: It's my money and I need it now!
Owners: It's OUR money and WE want it now!
Players: I like money. I like hockey too... decisions.
Owners: They are deceiving and disobeying us! Lockout for reasons!
Then lockout occurs. It is super effective at crushing hearts and souls across Canada and America.

One solution was Greg Wyshynski's suggestion that hockey fans across both countries have a movement in the way of "Occupy the NHL Store" which not only pokes fun at the capitalism of the thing, but also would be a pretty prevalent place in New York in which to draw some serious media attention. I think it's a good idea.

(You read nothing, I am not supporting this in any way that would later result in me not being hired by any sports network.) 

If you want more information, any ESPN story lays it out pretty well. These deadlines are not being met and for some reason, no one can play nice and compromise. All of those lessons in Kindergarten about sharing were complete crap. If you complain about money, you get it, no matter who suffers. Real world lessons here guys.

So whether you are a casual fan, or you bleed your teams' colors, this is going to hurt you one way or another. So please excuse me while I sob quietly in the corner into my Zach Parise jersey. By the way, the Wild aren't winning the Stanley Cup this year. I bet they don't even make it to the playoffs. But that's another story entirely.

Shout Out: Hockey fans are Hipsters, and I'm going to be a Professional

Remember how earlier I said I wanted us as American citizens to ensue wide sweeping stereotypes? Well I didn't really mean do that! But it seems that since anyone these days can blog about anything (talking about myself here) they did.

Here is an article that suggests that someone is extremely unhappy and albeit a bit butthurt that some people who call themselves hockey fans are somewhat uptight.

Well, from what I gather from both the genius comments below and the amazing layout of the post, this guy has something against hockey fans. He calls himself a "casual viewer" watching a total of 3 games of the playoffs, probably the team to match the city of whatever his favorite football or basketball team is. And I am here to say, that there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. He also states that "casual views" will help save the NHL from being on Versus, even though they have other stations, and the playoffs are shown on NBC every year.

But there is an issue with how he defined all of the fans as "Hipsters". And anyone that doesn't know what a Hipster is, here: (Even though I don't think you get why this blog is funny then)

Referring to young people of around 18-30 years of age, who drink cheap beer (most often Pabst Blue Ribbon, on occasion Budwiser), smoke Parliaments, Lucky Strikes or hard to obtain foreign cigarettes (such as Gauloises) and take recreational drugs, coke being the most popular. Use a great deal of sarcasm, claim to be ironic. Are usually less than 5% body fat, drink copious amounts of coffee and eat children's cereal. Listen to Indie Rock, rely heavily on Pitchfork Media to tell them what's cool. Don't dance at concerts. Wear a mixture of thrifted clothing and items bought at American Apparel (commonly Tri-blend v-necks) and Urban Outfitters. Extremely tight jeans worn by both sexes, pairing these with either a band or b-movie t shirt and a plaid shirt/v-neck and a cardigan along with Nike hi-tops/Vans/Keds. Females often wear retro style dresses and racerback tank tops without bras. Eschew public transport and instead choose to ride fixed-break bikes. Often claim to know about literature and film - will have googled a good deal of Vonnegut and French New Wave cinema.

So there you have it. They basically like everything no one else does in an effort to be different. And here is his definition of why Hockey fans are Hipsters:

They love something that has been wildly unpopular for so long and they cannot STAND anybody enjoying the sport casually like it’s mainstream. Its exactly like the Brooklyn hipsters who are like “I liked the band before they got popular.” Now that the NHL has made a bit of a comeback and there’s some new viewers, or every time baseball/football/basketball fans pay attention for playoff hockey, they get so fucking angry and spiteful and they climb up on their High Horses.

Hmm. First piece of incorrect information: Most hockey fans do not care if their sport is unpopular. It is their sport, and they will love it forever. Second piece of incorrect information: The NHL hasn't made a bit of a comeback. Unless he's talking about the lockout, which he is, and that happened in 2004-05. So not only is it incorrect, it's outdated. Third piece of incorrect information: While some population of the hockey world will do this "climb up on their high horses" most of them will not, I being one.

So, in conclusion, if you don't know what you're talking about, don't blog about it, and don't ensue wide sweeping stereotypes. Because even if they are sometimes true, you just look like a huge jerk.

(Oh, and out of all the pictures of fans you choose the "Hockey lovin' homos?" Nice try, but we all thought they were fantastic. You probably don't get why, we're too underground for you.)

Bah's Hockey World: Podcast Episode 1

  Alright-y guys! Episode 1, the Maiden Voyage of the Bah's Hockey World Podcast. I have guests, opinions, and really funny Snicker's commercials. So tune in!